| 题目 The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few dacades.Although some of these changes have been negative,the overall effect of this technology ha benn poitive.
What are your opinions on this
Entering into the new millenium,the increasingly broadening utilise if internet has brought uo a revolution ------- Changes have emerged in many aspects of peoples daily routine, particularly in communication, information and education.While people are making use of this amazing technology, disputes have been provocked as to whether or not the benefits of internet outweight its drawbacks.Personally, it is my belief that attendent problems though internet has,it is still a powerful and effective tool.(会不会很做作 = =)
Undeniably, the dominant merit of internet lies on its unique features,that is,Time-saving and convenient（好像语法错的）.For instance,compared with searching for thousands of books in library,information is way much easier to be find only if a computer with internet access is available.By typing in some words,the search engine will do all the taxing work just in a minute.Situations like spending enormous amount of time yet resulting in finding nothing relavent and valuable will never occur.
Furthermore,the advantage of using internet can be brought up to an international level.Thanks to the softwares such as MSN messager and Skype,communication with friends overseas instantanously can be realised.This also paved the way of a new form of international trade --------E-commerce,which has gradually become a indispesable way of doing bussiness internationally and intranationally.
Nevertheless,due to the fact that internet is accessable to everyone,including youngsters who are not capable enough to judge bad things from good ones.Information such as pornography and voilent crimes is open to them online so that detrimental influences on both yongsters themselves and the whole society can be caused.
By way of conclusion,internet is one of the most significant invention in the past dacades which has brought us immense profits.However ,to ensure that internet is properly used,attention should be drew on its negtive effects espacially concerning to children.This, in my view,should be on top of the government’s agenda.
------------------------------------------------------------------
题目4. Throughout the history, male leaders often made the society more violent and conflicting. If women governed the world, it would be a more peaceful world. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is safe to say that in present days,Our world’s political authority is dominantly in males’ hands ------Inspite of a few women’s faces,male leaders always take a majority proportion in international conferences.（中间怎么衔接一下？）Although the world is comparatively peaceful since the WWII,explosions and gunfires are still threatenning peoles lives.Some people argue that it is the male dominance that should be responsble to the war and voilent rule.However,it is my belief that these two sides are irrelevant.
First and foremost, it is inaccurate to simplely blame on the leader alone.The ultimate decision of implementing policies concerning a country’s military actions (such as declaring a war) and social issues(such as supressing a protest) can only be made by the whole governing group which including both men and women.Take The US and The UK for instance,only the parliaments are entitled to make the final approvements.
Futher,the styreotype people have towards male and female,namely,men are the source of violence whereas women can bring peace to the world based on their inherient personalities, is impartial and unsubstantial.What policies to perform in a country relies on the leader’s view and value（and as mentioned before,the whole policy-making group）.A woman leader could be aggressive and cold-blood while a man leader could be conservative and philanthropic.Thus,it is rediculous to consider the core of the issue as whether the leader is a she or he.
Additionally,although it seems like it is insurmountable it eliminate war and tyranny thoroughly in the world(at least in the near future).What people should emphisize is where the roots of the issue lies rather than accusing the male leaders alone.If confflictions could not be removed internationally and intranationally,Peace would never come.(虚拟语气的语法不知道对不对的)
By way of conclusion,the leader’s gender is not the key to addressing the issue of war and violence for: he/she is not the sole ultimate policy maker; male leader are not bound to be tyrannical and invasive and vice versa.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
题目
nowadays ther are many doctors specializing in profitable activities such as plastic surgery and private health care for priviliged patients.Should doctors,however, be concentrating more on public's health,regardless of how rich patients may be?
作文
Doctors,in most of the countries in today's world,are highly respected by people for they can save lives.Therefore,it has reached a kind of consensus that doctors are iindispensable to our society.However practising in public hospitals are often too stressful and taxing,coupled with a relatively lower income in many cases,a increasing number of doctors have started to look for alternative ways of making money ---- through doing profitable activities and working in private practices ,or even have ran their own ones.This ever-booming trend has arose doubts on whether doctors should exert more efforts caring for general publc's health or take patients' finacial backgrounds into consideration.
Doctors are needful everywhere:from educaional institutions to bussiness workplaces,from downtown areas to rural areas,from arm forces to govermental establishments.Apparently,private practices are much highly charged so that it makes this kind of medical care only affardable to people with higher payability.The problem is that,at present days,there are still a majority of population relaying on public servuces,medical care in paticular.What's more,walfare concerning medical treatments which aids people in despreate situations are only avaliable in public hospitals for the bills are paid by government.As a consequence, the main emphasis should be put on the general public rather than those priviliged individuals which takes only a small proportion of the whole population.
Nevertheless,doctors are complaining that their lives are becoming rather stuggling for the increasingly severe competition they suffered in public hospitals while being paid unsatisfyingly.threrefore,only by turning to alternative ways of practising such as doing more cosmatic surgeries and working for rich people privately can they live a better life,after all.their work is undoubtedly one of the most chanllenging works among all.
It is clear that both sides of this issue deserve a thorough consideration.However,my final opinion is that,first,as a doctor,the responsibility for the society and people should come first for it is a moral of top priority for them to bear in mind.Second,government should take care of the hardships confronting doctors by provoding imputes such as offering specific walfare for doctors ,improving working conditions,etc to make sure both interests of people and doctors.
======================================================================================
以上为同学作文 我们的老师会在一周内给你点评并以帖子形式回复 请多多关注论坛 谢谢 |
主题位置：论坛首页 > 资料下载 > 雅思写作 
