Improvements in health,education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However , the governments of the richer nations should take more responsibility for help the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
As the globalization degree is increasingly, global village has became a proliferation concept. In this case, i hold the view ,rich country take more responsibility, not only to think for themselves.
, but also to promote the development countries substantially.
The poor nations health and trade are accompanied by the rich ones as a result of globalization. rich nations can not separately advance, in turn, poor nations are more reliable on rich nations. This point can be firmly confirmed with an example of SARS. Apparently, developed countries can not defend the world-spread disease with a neglect measure , forbidding immigrants that period internationally. It is evident that helping the impoverished nations against SARA can be the best solution.
When it come to ecology,impoverished countries development mostly depend on raw materials,
Which are exported to the affluent countries at a maximum low price . Therefore , they, both are mutually benefits. Helping the poor nations economically is just a aspect of developing affluent countries themselves.
In term of education, more or less, i consider it has some certain connections with cultural identity which can not be absent from cultural diversity. more importantly, with the advanced techniques the affluent nations gives through education , impoverished ones can be really independent and conduct beneficial influence to the plant more.
In my conclusion, the wealthy counties and the not wealthy ones can not be apart absolutely. However, richer ones should take more responsibility for helping the poor ones , only in this way, do they make enormous interests reality.
第三篇
When a country develops its technology ,the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this day and age, high technology plays a significant role in individuals' lives. Whether it is pointless to try and keep the traditional skills and ways of life under the high-tech background is a discussion that sparking much debates. As i see, it is overly simplicity.
There is no doubt that high- really transform lifestyles and enhance efficiency greatly. This point can be well confirmed with the example of computer. As we known, it is efficient and accurate when computers conduct the complicated data or cope with various problems. Future more , handsets are a indispensable part in routine. To be more exact , handsets afford individuals telecommunications conveniently, consequently, wherever we are , handsets can take voice to the person you want.
However ,traditional skills and ways of life still make beneficially sense. In terms of the education, in spite of the high-tech, the school educations prevail over the on-line distance ones and welcomed by majority. More over ,when it comes to reading, it is manifest that most tend to the traditional printed books or magazines. Only a little proportion get accustomed to E-books. By that i mean , some traditional skills and ways of life can not replaced or transformed by high-tech.
On the basis of the above discussion , individuals benefit from technological innovation. Nonetheless, the traditions can not be abandoned. A certain degree balance between both may creates a great deal of interests.
======================================================================================
以上为同学的三篇作文 我们的老师会在一周内给你点评并以帖子形式回复 请多多关注论坛 谢谢
*****EndFragment--> *****EndFragment-->